Sunday, September 11, 2016

The Broad Foundation and Broadies: Kings of “Disruptive” and“Unreasonable” Trickle-Down Reform – Cloaking Inequity

The Broad Foundation and Broadies: Kings of "Disruptive" and "Unreasonable" Trickle-Down Reform – Cloaking Inequity

The Broad Foundation and Broadies: Kings of "Disruptive" and "Unreasonable" Trickle-Down Reform

Eli Broad is infamous for his book The Art of Being Unreasonable. Broad is also know for venture philanthropy, the approach billionaires have taken to influence and direct educational policy by inserting billions of dollars. Is the Broad "disruptive" and "unreasonable" trickle-down approach to school reform the right fit for the United States? For your community? (For all of Cloaking Inequity's posts on Trickle-down reform click here) Today Cloaking Inequity will explore the Broad Foundation, Eli Broad's philosophy of venture philanthropy and the guiding tenants of The Broad Superintendents Academy. In a future post here at Cloaking Inequity, I will take up Houston's selection as the the first two-time winner of the Broad Prize.
Birth of the Broad Foundation
Billionaires Eli & Edythe Broad come from humble beginnings in Detroit. The couple both worked their way through the Detroit public school system, then Eli Broad continued on to Michigan State University (Go Blue!). Eventually graduating with a degree in accounting and later becoming a CPA. In 1957, Eli Broad started up a construction business with family member Donald Kaufman. Kaufman and Broad formed KB Homes; a company that would eventually be publically traded and turn sizable profits.[3] In 1971, Broad purchased a life insurance company called SunAmerica. SunAmerica grew and was ultimately merged with AIG in 1999.[4]
The sale and merger of SunAmerica in 1999 marked a turning point for the Broads. Although the couple established a foundation for charitable giving back in the 1960s, the 1999 sellout spurred the growth of the foundation with Eli taking the lead. Then in 2010, Eli and Edythe Broad signed The Giving Pledge, stating they would pledge 75% of their wealth to venture philanthropy. The Broads identified public education as a focal point of their giving.[5] As of 2011, the Broads have given $500 million to public education and $2 billion to The Broad Foundation.[6]
Venture Philanthropy
Eli Broad is guided by his self-defined criteria of venture philanthropy. In Eli Broad 2012 book, The Art of Being Unreasonable, he outlines criteria for his giving. Eli Broad prescribes to the notion that running The Broad Foundation more like a for-profit than a non-profit. He further clarified that he is not operating a charity and that he expects results for each dollar spent.[7] Some have called Eli Broad a "control freak" and a "bully" as his giving is known to come with strings attached.[8] Eli Broad responds by stating that he is "not a bully, but I am not a potted plant either" maintaining a primary role in the decision-making of the various initiatives in The Broad Foundations.[9]
Academics have also critically discussed venture philanthropy. Educational historian Diane Ravitch explains the venture philanthropy approach stating, "venture philanthropists began with different emphasis, but over time they converged in support of reform strategies that mirrored their own experience in acquiring huge fortunes, such as competition, choice, deregulation, incentives, and other market-based approaches."[10]  The work of Janelle Scott of the University of California, Berkeley underscores Ravitch's concerns with what she refers to as cross pollination of neoliberal philanthropic foundations co-contributing only to like-minded entities.[12]  In sum, the concept of venture philanthropy as applied to educational reform has drawn criticism from some quarters.eli-broad
Impact of the Broad Foundation
The Broad Foundation has diverse and a significant role American philanthropy. Headquartered in the founders' hometown of Los Angeles, California, the foundation aims to utilize "entrepreneurship for the public good in education, science, and the arts." The Broad Center and The Broad Prize for Urban Education are the two areas of The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation Education that serve as the action arms of the larger educational foundation. The Broad Prize for Urban Education is an annual award of $1 million established in 2002[13] to honor urban school districts that show "overall performance and improvement in student achievement while reducing achievement gaps among poor and minority students."[14]
Driven by the founder's philosophy of venture philanthropy, it is important to note the process and decision-making body for the prize. The Broad Prize for Urban Education in public school districts is not an application-based award; rather a review board evaluates districts. For instance the 2013 prize included board members such as Elisa Villanueva Beard (Teach for America), Christopher Cross (former assistant secretary of education under President George W. Bush), Frederick Hess (American Enterprise Institute and executive editor Education Next), Alexander Sandy Kress (former education advisor to President George W. Bush and Pearson lobbyist) amongst others.[15] Each individual has clearly influenced the development of educational policy and/or participated in significant top-down reform efforts in education. Many of them hold the common tie of supporting measures of high-stakes accountability, alternative teacher certification, and privatization through school choice.
As commendable as the stated mission and core beliefs of the Broad Prize appears to be to improve urban education, it is guided by the trickle-down reform philosophies of Eli Broad. What is the true role of the Broad Prize? According to Broad, "our current public education system is fundamentally broken"[16] and "entire public school systems must be transformed."[17] What is meant by these vague statements can be culled by diving into their list of 75 Examples of How Bureaucracy Stands in the Way of America's Students & Teachers, and quotes from their alumni explaining the importance of Broad. Broad identifies "labor laws, regulations and collective bargaining agreements" as major barriers to the success of our public schools. Throughout the alumni profiles listed on the site there is a constant drum beat that ties inefficiency to poor administrator and teacher management and evaluation, and the necessity of market driven management styles to achieve gains and achieve an efficient system of public schools.
Who are Broad's allies in the prize? A high-profile board of directors guides The Broad Center. The lineup of board members includes Wendy Kopp (Teach for America founder), Michelle Rhee (StudentsFirst founder and CEO and the former chancellor of District of Columbia Public Schools), and Richard Barth (Knowledge is Power Program-KIPP Foundation CEO).[18] Beyond the ideological background accompanying the above-mentioned individuals in the decision-making process there is that financial contributions to their organizations. Notably, Teach for America, StudentsFirst, KIPP each received funds in 2011-2012 from the parent foundation.[19] The strong educational ideologies and political ties of the board members coupled with the financial ties to the larger foundation muddle the seemingly admirable mission and core beliefs of The Broad Prize.
Screen Shot 2013-10-04 at 10.18.21 AM
The Broad Residency in Urban Education & The Broad Superintendents Academy
Working from the trickle-down reform concept embraced by the founder Eli Broad,[20] The Broad Center has two primary programs to train educational leaders: The Broad Residency in Urban Education (Broad Residency) and The Broad Superintendents Academy. Both established in 2002, these leadership programs have trained over 400 individuals with 150 graduates of The Broad Superintendents Academy.
The Broad Residency is a two-year paid program that trains individuals for managerial positions in education. Requiring applicants to have advanced degrees, at least four years of work experience, and experience in one or more functional business areas (finance, operations, strategy, general management, human resources, or information technology), the Broad Residency directly aims to bring business practices to education. In the specified selection criteria, the application explains "these individuals (experienced business men and women) can bring best practices into an industry that historically has been slow to adopt practices that improve operations."  The accepted candidates are placed in partnership organizations including metropolitan school districts, charter management organizations (CMOs), and state/federal departments of education.[21] Unlike The Broad Superintendents Academy that typically denies the development of top-down reformers in education,[22] The Broad Residency is forthright throughout the application process that expressed value placed on disruptive business-minded decision making for educational leaders.
The Broad Superintendent Academy is a highly selective training program with allusive selection criteria. Although specifics are not available for exact qualifications or what Broad interviewers are looking for in a candidate, The Broad Superintendent Academy does disclose in the aggregate track record of graduates and general qualifications for potential Broad candidates. The foundation reports 150 graduates with 96 holding or having held superintendent positions.[23]
While the glossy brochures and soaring mission of Broad seems admirable and innocuous, insight into the design and intended goals of the academy can be found in a July 2012 New Jersey open records request by the Education Law Center. A public records request looking into the New Jersey Department of Education and Commissioner Christopher Cerf (A 2007 Broad Superintendent Academy alum[24]), resulted in the release of a March 2012 board memo regarding The Broad Superintendents Academy.[25] According to The Broad Center memo, several actions for revamping the academy were under consideration by the Broad Board of Directors. Of the proposed changes to the Academy was the creation of the Academy 2.0. Recommendations in the memo would have the Academy focus on the creation of leaders to "disrupt the status quo."  To accomplish Broad's Art of Being Unreasonable, the memo proposes a shift away from core knowledge for future educational leaders and toward reform priorities and reform "accelerators." The Broad Center memo indicated that the four reform priorities as measurement of educator effectiveness, innovative learning models, accountability, and school choice. Specific reform accelerators accompany the implementation of the four reform priorities. These include strategies for removing obstacles, political navigation, community management, building political presence through public speaking and publishing opportunities, and individualized leadership training.[26]
In the 2012 memo, Academy 2.0 would market the research done on high-profile successful reform leaders to refine the selection process to target "bold visionary leaders with a proven history of breakthrough reforms," "passionate, civic-minded, and disruptive non-traditional leaders with significant political experience," and those with "a history of implementing an aggressive reform agenda."  Specific names such as Wendy Kopp, Michelle Rhee, Christopher Chef, Joel Klein, and Pete Gorman were mentioned as profiled leaders used as exemplars. Another key aspect gleaned from the memo was the desire to "drive talent to strategic locations with strong conditions for reform." Essentially, locating and facilitating the placement of Broad graduates into reform primed placements in urban areas in the United States to maximize the impact of the Broad Academy.[27]
Broad Trickle-down Reformers Find Trouble
Over the last 11 years, the Broad Center has been busy training and placing some of the most controversial public school district superintendents and state education leaders. They have created a large footprint of market-minded superintendents in places such as California, Chicago, Colorado, Louisiana, Maryland, Michigan, New York, New Jersey, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Texas. And Broad continues to make their presence palpable with various administrative staff placements. However, Broad fellows also have acquired reputations for having the propensity to find trouble by creating "unreasonable" maladaptive and illicit disruptions. [28]
Mike Miles Finds Trouble in Dallas
In July 2013, the school board announced that Mike Miles had apparently violated policy with regards to an OPR investigation dealing with a contract for community and parent services.[29] The board voted unanimously to spend up to $100,000 and hire an outside investigator. The matter was referred to Paul Coggins, former U.S. District attorney.[30] Moving forward, the Dallas ISD School Board will be obtaining a report from the ongoing investigation after Labor Day in 2013.[31]
Turnover has plagued Miles' superintendency. Notably, the number of experienced teachers and principals that resigned under Miles was the largest in the history of Dallas ISD. [32] A plethora of veteran teachers and principals decided to retire or go to other districts. According to education blogs, Dallas ISD had over 1,700 vacancies in July 2013.[33] In a reaction to this, Mike Miles sent a request to surrounding districts to not hire Dallas ISD teachers.[34] Some critics have argued that Miles has lost control and has "intimidated" teachers and principals who had been with the district. Some principals have filed lawsuits, such as former principal, Dr. Shaver, who was fired.[35]
Miles has experienced high-levels of turnover amongst the various departmental leadership and cabinet positions. For example, Jamal Jenkins, a former Broad Residency graduate, was brought on by Miles to be an Executive Director of Human Resources. Mr. Jenkins left prior to the conclusion of Mr. Miles' first year as head of Dallas ISD. In his case the HR position was already vacated by mid October 2012.[36]
Other Broad Fellows Find Trouble
Miles is in similar company with many other Broad Fellows. Broad's "art of being unreasonable" top-down reform approach to public school districts has not been without significant contention. [37] For example, charges of ignoring teacher concerns and implementing divisive orders have resulted in several high profile incidents of the superintendents Broad has trained. Their superintendent trainees are making headlines as their jobs are on the line due to many issues of impropriety and an unusually large volume of worker grievances.[38] In Rhode Island, 82% of teachers in the state feel less respected than they had prior to Deborah Gist coming into power.[39] In the Rochester school district in NY employees overwhelmingly gave a vote of "no confidence" (95% of those who voted) to Superintendent Jean-Claude Brizard. Many others have been involved in high profile departures from their school districts. Los Angeles Unified School District head, John Deasy, was recently rated by his teachers and earned a score of 1.36 out of 5 possible points.[40] This is coupled with his controversial Ph.D., in which, he only earned nine hours of credit before being awarded the degree from The University of Louisville.[41] And, the late Maria Goodloe-Johnson was fired for financial impropriety in Seattle.[42]
While seemingly innocuous, the reform agenda actually espoused by Broad in the shadows via billions of dollars is the same as that of the other privatization education forces, like Michelle Rhee's Student's First, The American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), and The Thomas B. Fordham Institute. These are trickle-down reformers focused on anti-democratic top-down reforms.
Diane Ravitch has spoken out against the venture philanthropy concept of private foundations run by America's wealthy buying and dictating public education policy. Lacking the oversight and checks placed on public actions and funds, America's financial elite are influencing and undermining the public school system without bounds.[11]
This post was written in conjunction with Lindsay Redd and Dr. Ruth Vail and was excerpted from a report commissioned by the Foundation for Community Empowerment.
Please Facebook Like, Tweet, etc below and/or reblog to share this discussion with others.
Want to know about Cloaking Inequity's freshly pressed conversations about educational policy? Click the "Follow blog by email" button in the upper left hand corner of this page.
Twitter: @ProfessorJVH
Click here for Vitae.
Please blame Siri for any typos.
[3] Colacello, B. (2006). Eli Broad's Big Picture. Vanity Fair, (December), 324–330; 379–384.
[4] Broad, E. (2012). The art of being unreasonable. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc. and Safer, M. (2011, April 23). 60 Minutes: Why and how Eli Broad is giving billions away.
[5] Retrieved from The Giving Pledge
[6]Safer, M. (2011, April 23). 60 Minutes: Why and how Eli Broad is giving billions away.
[7] Ibid.
[9] Safer, M. (2011, April 23). 60 Minutes: Why and how Eli Broad is giving billions away.
[10] Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.
[11] Ibid
[12] Scott, J. (2009). The politics of venture philanthropy in charter school policy and advocacy. Educational Policy, 23(106), 106–136.
[13] Soon after Rod Paige left, Houston ISD won the first Broad Prize.
[14] Retrieved from The Broad Prize
[15] Retrieved from The Broad Prize 2013 Other review members included Anne L. Bryant, Dan Goldhaber, Jane Hannaway, Eric Hanushek, Karen Hawley Miles, Patricia W. Levesque, Deborah McGriff, Thomas W. Payzant, Delia Pompa, Margot Rogers, Andew Rotherham, John Simpson, and Gene Wilhoit.
[18] Retrieved from The Broad Center Additional members include Paul Pastorek, Barry Munitz, Becca Bracy Knight, Harold Ford J., Louis Gerstner, Jr., Dan Katzir, Margaret Spellings, Andrew L. Stern, and Lawrence H. Summers.
[19] The Broad Foundation. (2012). The Broad Foundations 2011-2012 report. Los Angeles, CA.
[20] Broad, E. (2012). The art of being unreasonable. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
[21] Retrieved from The Broad Residency with full list of partnership organizations available at
[22] Retrieved from The Broad Center Commentary
[23] Retrieved from The Broad Superintendents Academy
[24]  Retrieved from The Broad Report
[25] Retrieved from Education Law Center
[26] Retrieved from Washington Post
[27] Retrieved from Washington Post
[28] PDFs/Featured Graduate Broad.docx
[29] ISD-investigation-violates-spirit-of-public-information-act.ece
[31] ISD-cleans-house/
[33] ISD-teachers-end-of-year-Dallas ISD-vacancies-double/
[37] Samuels, Christina A. (2011/06/08). Critics target growing army of broad leaders. Education Week, 30, 1.


Wednesday, September 7, 2016

Smaller Class Sizes Has Multiple Benefits on Learning

Smaller Class Sizes Has Multiple Benefits on Learning

Smaller Class Sizes Has Multiple Benefits on Learning


With schools growing considerably in size and many smaller educational establishments closing their doors, could growing class sizes be affecting children's learning? Maybe. Research has found that small classes with fewer than 20 students are beneficial to children, particularly in primary grades.

There are several advantages for small class sizes for children and here are a few of the most important ones, in our opinion:

More One-to-One Attention

With a class size of more than 30 children, it can be hard for teachers to provide one-to-one time to each child even if they have a teaching assistant. In smaller classes, the teacher's time isn't spread so thin and they can spend more one-to-one time with individual students.

This individual attention can be highly beneficial and have a positive influence on children's personal achievements and test scores. According to the 1980s Student Teacher Achievement Ration (STAR) study, when a class is reduced by 7 students (or 32% in this particular case) student achievement is increased by the equivalent of an additional 3 months of schooling.

These findings were particularly strong in classes of young children or those from less advantaged family backgrounds.

Students Get an Increased Opportunity to Bond

With smaller class sizes, children spend more time together in a close group, meaning they build strong friendships rather than simply gain acquaintances. With more time spent together, these friendships are more likely to stand the test of time.

A Chance to Tailor Individual Learning

Not everyone learns the same way. Some people learn best through listening, whereas others may be visual or even kinesthetic, hands-on, learners. Smaller classes can work to the children's benefit, as the teacher will have more free time to specifically design a lesson plan that plays to specific students' strengths and will be most effective for individual needs.

No one will get left behind in a smaller class since it is easier for the teacher to cater to both sides of the bell curve.

Less Disruption

Let's face it, no matter how good the teacher is, when there are 30 plus students in a room there is going to be noise and disruption. Concentration can easily be broken, meaning children's learning is interrupted on a daily basis, but with smaller class sizes this is less likely. Discipline is less likely to be a problem and the class is likely to be much quieter, aiding concentration.

More Time Actually Learning

A 2014 study by the Organisation for Economic Development and Cooperation (OECD) found that teachers in England spend just 20 hours a week in the classroom. The rest of their time is spent on administrative tasks, lesson preparation, and marking.

Some teachers even spend up to 20% of their classroom time doing further administration, meaning just 16 of the 48 hours teachers spend in the classroom per week are spent on teaching pupils.

The more students in a class, the more time basic administration and everyday tasks take. Taking the register, marking work, reading lessons – it all takes much longer. Small classes speed this up and children are more likely to receive thoughtful and encouraging comments on their work.

Could Private Tutoring Help?

Sometimes large classes are unavoidable, so to ensure your children get the much-needed one-to-one education they require, why not invest in private tutoring?

Available by the hour, with tutors who specialize in particular subjects, your child could get extra lessons outside of school to help bring up grades or encourage them to excel even more than they already do.

Some of the benefits of tutoring include:

  • Learning at one's own pace
  • Flexible and convenient lessons
  • Increasing motivation to learn in all subjects
  • Improving self-esteem and confidence
  • Encouraging self-learning
  • Improving grades

Featured photo credit: All images are creative commons public domain and are free to use. via

Love this article? Share it with your friends on Facebook


Thursday, July 28, 2016

8 ways to make edu-mischief while California Superintendent Tom Torlakson is Acting Governor

8 ways to make edu-mischief while California Superintendent Tom Torlakson is Acting Governor
Dear Tom Torlakson: Here are 8 things we could do while the politicians are away! We gotta hurry!
View this email in your browser


Imagine my surprise when I heard on NPR yesterday that State Superintendent of schools Tom Torlakson--my very favorite State official--is Acting Governor of California for the rest of the week. This is what happens when your whole state government comprises the biggest delegation at the Democratic National Convention.

While every other force in Golden State politics is looking for unity in the City of Brotherly Love, my mind leaps to the education priorities we could advance!

It wouldn't be the first time an Acting Governor did a whole lot of governing when Jerry Brown was out of state. But it's certainly a first for a Superintendent.

So I've penned a letter to the Superintendent to offer my assistance.

Dear Acting Governor Torlakson,

First off, congrats!

I am writing you to offer to rush to the State Capital to work feverishly alongside you to advance our public education priorities while the rest of California's political wish lists languish in the Philadelphia International Airport baggage claim. (It's not their fault they exceeded the 3.7 ounce limit.)

I admit, I've been feeling envy what with all the selfies my friends have been posting. Betsy pictured with Dolores Huerta. Randi pictured with Bill Clinton. Carolyn and Dallas were even interviewed about their experiences as mother and daughter in Hillary's and Bernie's respective delegations.

But, oh, the things we can get done for our schools while they're distracting our elected officials! 

By the way, Tom, I hope you don't let the *Acting* qualifier get in the way of the work we can do together. The philanthropists and politicians certainly haven't let their lack of credentials get in the way of dictating what our teachers and principals do. So let's give it a go!

Just say the word and I'll be on the next Southwest flight to Sacramento. I'll use carry-on, so my only baggage will be emotional--a decade of mourning for the once top-funded California public school system and my more recent PTSD from the assault on public schools by the charter lobby.

But there's no time for a pity party. Here's my short list!

Copyright © 2016 PSconnect, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this because you have expressed interest in public education issues in Los Angeles.

Our mailing address is:
Los Angeles
Los Angeles, CA 90291

Add us to your address book

Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list

Email Marketing Powered by MailChimp

Saturday, June 11, 2016

The Walton Family: America’s New Robber Barons

The Walton Family: America's New Robber Barons

The Walton Family: America's New Robber Barons

Walmart's ruling family, the Waltons, has more wealth than 42% of American families combined.

The Walton family is the richest family in the United States, with more wealth than Bill Gates and Warren Buffett combined. The Waltons' wealth comes from their inherited, controlling stake in Walmart. While Walmart workers live in poverty, the Waltons rake in billions every year from the company.

And the Waltons just keep getting richer.

Since 2007, while millions of Americans were having their homes confiscated and jobs eliminated, the fortune of the six Waltons on the Forbes 400 list has more than doubled to an astounding $148.8 billion.

The Waltons have these riches thanks to the hard work of their own employees and all of us taxpayers. Based on recent estimates, taxpayers subsidize Walmart as much as $3 billion per year.[1] Instead of paying workers enough to survive, the Waltons take billions from Walmart every year, while driving their workers on to food stamps and other public assistance.

Unlike their employees, the Waltons reap billions from Walmart every year.

Three Waltons—Rob, Jim, and Alice (all children of Walmart founder Sam Walton)—own over 50% of outstanding Walmart shares. This fiscal year, Rob, Jim, and Alice (and the various entities that they control) will receive an estimated $3.16 billion in Walmart dividends on those shares.

If Sam Walton's dependents actually worked for their Walmart dividend checks this year, they would be handed $1.5 million every hour. Meanwhile, Walmart workers get an average of $8.81 per hour and are routinely denied full-time work.[2]

Amid concerns about the fiscal cliff in December 2012, Walmart moved up the final dividend payout of its fiscal year from January 2013 to December 2012 to avoid a possible increase in the tax rate on dividends. As the company's largest and wealthiest shareholders, the Waltons were the biggest beneficiaries of the move.

Most Walmart workers can only dream of making $25,000 in a year. Meanwhile, the Waltons get $25,000 per minute from their Walmart dividends alone.

The Waltons can certainly afford to do better by their workers and the American taxpayers who subsidize their profit-at-any-cost model, but they continue to choose not to.

The Waltons, using their their investment income alone, could fund a permanent $10,000 wage increase for the 1 million hourly store associates whose work generates Walmart's profits.[3]

Updated 3/5/14

[1] A May 2013 report by the Democratic staff of the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce estimated a taxpayer cost of $3,015 per Walmart employee because of Walmart workers' reliance on taxpayer funded programs. To arrive at the $3 billion figure, we simply multiplied the $3,015 estimate by roughly 1 million retail employees.

[2] Sam Walton's dependents include his children Alice, Rob, and Jim, as well as Christy, who is the widow of his late son John. This calculation is based on share ownership data from Walmart's 2014 filings and Walmart's declared FY 2015 dividend of $1.92 per share (see here).

[3] According to a Forbes analysis of their large holdings in public companies, the combined fortune of the six heirs to Walmart founders Sam and Bud Walton stands at $148.8 billion (the six heirs are Alice, Jim, Rob and Christy Walton, Nancy Walton Laurie, and Anne Walton Kroenke). Assuming a 7% rate of return on their fortune, the Waltons would receive more than $10 billion annually. From 2003-2012, the rate of return on the S&P 500 has been just above 7%; the long-run rate of return is closer to 10%.